Chinese Minister declares that, basically, China’s Rare Earth Industry needs ‘a whole lot of Rectifying’

China’s Plays The Rare Earth Element Health Card-RareMetalBlogWe must “Rectify the rare earth industry, rectify the excessive and indiscriminate digging of domestic rare earth resources, rectify uncontrolled exploitation of rare earth resources, rectify the various contradictions in the development of the rare earth industry -including mining, smelting, trading and exporting. The Chinese government is duty bound to observe regulation on the sector. China’s restrictions on rare earth production and exports are meant to protect the environment and the resources, for which conduct should be above reproach.” Thus did Li Yizhong say before Chinese media on March 4 and March 6. Li Yizhong is the former minister of China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT). He addressed “two summits” in Beijing this week, acting as the vice chairman of the Economic Commission of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC). Li was very big on the rectification theme, adding: “Should the rectification of China’s rare earth industries raise objections, especially from some Western countries, these are totally baseless. China will continue to firmly pursue the integration of its rare earth metals industry.”

Obviously, because of the accusations brought against China of breaking WTO rules on rare earth exports, the Mr. Li was not shy to express his annoyance at some Western countries, such as the European Union, the United States and Japan, which launched a rare earth complaint before the  WTO against China almost exactly a year ago.

My opinion is that the diversification of the supply of rare earth elements has gathered a consensus and an acceptance throughout the global market. In spite of facing the rare earth WTO lawsuit, China will continue regulating the sector whether it wins or loses the trade dispute. And why is that, you ask? We must be willing to concede that the Chinese rare earth industry has been, for lack of a better term, rather a bit of a dog’s breakfast in the past few years. The country’s rare earth industry had been harmed by illegal mining, chaotic production and exports. The export quota system helps curb the messy situation softening throat-cutting competition of rare earth exports while offering other producers of non-Chinese rare earths projects a chance to boost their production.

Does this mean China’s export quota system will never be removed? Perhaps, but this is not a bad thing. Due to China’s rare earth metals industry relatively small scale, it features a high concentration rate with numerous businesses. At the same time, it lacks large enterprises with core competitiveness. Self-discipline in the industry is also weak, and vicious competition exists. Moreover, there are many problems that ensued due to a lack of sound legal regulations, therefore, it is difficult to avoid that some less than honorable ‘enterprises’, operating in a way that shows a low sense of responsibility and flagrant disregard for the law will certainly be seduced by the lure of high profits. They start to gamble, foregoing any moral principles in the pursuit of profits. Therefore, the integration of the rare earth industry is essential for China. Only after integrating the currently fragmented industry, will state-owned large enterprises have the sense and ability to control productivity and prices, even without government restriction and supervision. When this is achieved, and only then, China’s export quota system could be lifted.

I believe that China will remain firmly integrated within the rare earth metals industry. The central government has set targets to encouraging mergers in rare earth industry sectors to enhance the state-owned large enterprises’ global competitiveness.

  1. Thnx Hongpo,
    Yet more along a similar theme, seems to me there is a bit of a propaganda campaign to end users with the theme “The price floor is set, the baseline established, what you see is what you get”, now get on with it.
    Probably just need an up tick in industrial production to shake out the lethargy and hopefully the US is starting to show some signs of leading the pack.
    Any further news on that Trading Platform Hongpo? Or any thoughts on why it is delayed?

    • Tim,thank you for your comments,
      About the Baotou’s trading platform,if I get the latest news, I will update immediately.
      However, a puzzling question,on March 5,The Guangdong government said on its website,they also plans to set up a southern rare earth trading center in Guangdong province in 2013.

      Best Regards
      Hongpo

      • Thnx again Hongpo, I guess the inference there is basically a LRE trading platform under Baotou in the north and a HRE platform in Guangdong.
        Or is a provincial state perhaps challenging central control? In that case perhaps internal rivalries are behind the delay.

  2. I have big holdings of LYNAS and MCP, and smaller holdings of
    AVN and QRM. All are seriously underwater and I have already
    attempted to average down to the point where I am uncomfortable
    with the percentage of my portfolio is invested in this sector. In
    short, bad news for the production, and specifically the export of
    REE from China is good news to me. I am curious as to how the
    Chinese Government can feel that integration through mergers
    into state-owned, competitive enterprises will solve their problem.
    It sounds like a return to centralized planning a la collective farming
    under the “Great Leap Forward” programs of Mao, with disastrous
    results. Li did not address the Chinese attempts across the globe
    to acquire REE companies and real estate. I am amazed Western
    companies values have continued to decline in view of the foregoing.

  3. John,
    ROW RE stocks have suffered from weak demand overhung by the fear of China releasing RE production at ever lower prices. By enforcing control & discipline over producers, maintaining export quotas at 30ktpa and suggesting the balance will be retained for domestic value add China is sending the message that they’ve drawn the line on prices & export quantities, no point in holding off for lower prices, so get on with it, & no point bleating to the WTO.
    Tides a long way out so I doubt it turning will float all boats but anyone that can compete on product range & price, with reliable supply, has got a shot if ROW demand rebuilds.

  4. Just a comment and question?

    Comment: 30 years ago in Texas some of us were unwilling to pump oil at selling price, feeling the “oil in the ground” exceeded the “going selling price” in USD.

    Fast forward: willing to pump oil currently.

    Question: if the had 100,000 USD to invest:
    1. Keep in USD?
    2. Buy Gold?
    3. Hold Rare Earth Elements/Shares? Chinese or Rest of the World (ROW)?

    Kind regards,

    • Hi!I think.Invest 100,000 usd in precius metal like -Silver 50%(phisical)
      Other 50% -Gold.platinum.palladium(phisical),
      Also-Latvian Forest!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

REE Leaders Index
REE Leaders Index
(Bloomberg Ticker: REEL)
Lead Sponsors
Krucible Metals Ltd. Something else
Cancel
REE World login
ProEdge Media
Copyright © 2012 ProEdge Media Corp. All rights reserved.

ProEdge Media Corp. text, photos, graphics and logos shall not be used for commercial purposes, reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. ProEdge Media Corp. shall not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions in any ProEdge Media Corp. original content, or for any actions taken in consequence. ProEdge Media Corp. materials may not be stored in whole or in part in a computer except for personal non-commercial use. As a newswire service ProEdge Media Corp. does not obtain release from the subjects, individuals, groups or entities contained in its photographs, graphics or quoted in its text. Further, no clearance is obtained from the owners of any trademarks or copyrighted material where the marks and material are included in ProEdge Media Corp. photos or content. You shall be solely responsible for obtaining any and all the necessary releases from whatever individual or entity is necessary for any of your uses of ProEdge Media Corp. material. You agree to indemnify ProEdge Media Corp. from any losses, damages and expenses (including reasonable attorney fees) it incurs as a result of any claim based on your use of its materials in violation of these terms.

Disclaimer: ProEdge Media Corp., owners and operators of the ProEdgeWire and affiliated sites, has established the following rules to ensure that there is no appearance of impropriety on the part of any ProEdge Editorial writers. The content of ProEdge Editorial articles are the opinion of the Writer and any reliance on the content of these articles is at your sole risk. Our Writers are not registered investment advisors. You should not make any kind of investment decision in relation to Articles or stocks discussed in them without obtaining advice from a registered investment advisor.

Facts relied upon by our Writers are generally provided by the subject companies or gathered by our Writers from other public and/or private sources. These facts may be in error and if so, the opinions of our Writers may be materially different. Often times ProEdge writers will utilize advertorial companies as content sources. This is because we represent many of the leading companies in various sectors covered in our sites. Our advertisers are publicly disclosed at all times and listed in alphabetical order on the right column of each affiliated section.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact us directly at (416) 581-0177 or email us at Publisher@ProEdgeMedia.com

exit
REE Leaders Index
REE Leaders Index
 (Bloomberg Ticker: REEL)
REE Leaders Index