The rare earth metals producer Molycorp (NYSE: MCP) has issued plenty of warnings about a significant decline in revenue and cash flow in the first quarter 2013. In addition, the company warned that it could end up with a cash deficit of about USD$ 250 million. The market responded as expected and its shares dropped 11% on Thursday. In fact, Molycorp’s shares have dropped 61% in 2012 over lower than expected rare earth prices in general, demand concerns and an SEC investigation. Molycorp has also been guilty of over-promising and under delivering, given some production problems causing delays in achieving its target of 19,050 tons a year of REO’s from its Mountain Pass facility in California.
Molycorp said that its fourth quarter 2012 revenue and cash flow were much lower than expected – and there are few favorable prospects on the horizon. However, the company remains active and still expects the first phase of commercial production at a rate of 19,050 metric tons of rare earth products to be achieved about mid-2013. Molycorp had hoped to achieve this milestone in late 2012. If these burdens are not enough, Molycorp also has to deal with the expansion and modernization of the plant requiring several hundred million dollars in capital expenditure on the plant. Molycorp announced that it shares with a value of 200, and will sell bonds worth 100 million dollars to pay the capital costs.
The question for those who have been following Molycorp and waiting for some good news is why Molycorp doesn’t simply divest itself from the Mountain Pass mine, which as noted above has been a veritable money pit. That would leave the ‘Molycorp Canada’ the former Neo Materials, which Molycorp purchased last year to gain access to its processing technologies in powders used in sophisticated high-performance bonded magnets. Nevertheless, the divestment argument is not entirely convincing even if it makes considerable sense. In medical terns, a doctor does not amputate his patient’s arm simply because it was broken during a fall; Molycorp has not reached the ‘amputation’ stage – yet.
Molycorp started 2013 with rumors of a takeover and in theory the Company has some basic takeover appeal; it is producing rare earths, the Mountain Pass mine was once the world’s largest producer of rare earths and the uses for rare earths increase by the day with new applications and discoveries. The United States moreover, as stated by President Obama during his inauguration speech and as expressed in the Smart Sale Act (SSA), is keen to develop strategic natural and manufactured resources at home. China is one of the targets of the SSA and, while much of the speculation over a possible buyer for Molycorp has focused on China, the US Government would be very reluctant to allow it. For all of the challenges, Molycorp is still the main supplier of rare earth oxides outside of China and has been producing rare earths since the 1950’s and it still has the opportunity to become a major producer once (or if?) the expanded facility is in place. At the same time, the time for the takeover is now, or while share price is well below expectations.
The intensification of the Senkaku/Diaoyu dispute between China and Japan has already determined a vast reduction of Chinese rare earth exports to Japan. The dispute was also the spark that prompted the re-launch of the Mountain Pass mine after a ten year closure. It would be illogical for the US to allow China to buy Mountain Pass in the midst of a renewed and likely prolonged Sino-Japanese quarrel (it already tried to buy Mountain Pass in 2005 only to be blocked by Congress) while Congress is debating the SSA, a legislative proposal that has been praised by the Strategic Materials Advisory Council. The buyers would have to come from countries that are close US allies. Molycorp, therefore, for all its issues might still appeal to a large manufacturer that needs to obtain guaranteed access to critical metals. Surely, the buyers (probably automobile manufacturers with large commercial needs for battery and electric motor materials) do not need to get their own rare earth supply, but by controlling raw materials, they also control their competitors’ access to such materials: and therein lies the appeal. Toyota, for example bought the Salar de Olaroz lithium mine (developed by Orocobre, Toyota Tsusho and Jujuy Province mining and Energy company) just to ensure it had enough lithium to make its electric vehicles. Therefore, a logical case can be made for a big investor to take a serious gander at Molycorp, which means this possibility (if not probability) should make Molycorp one of the more interesting companies to watch this year. For those in a very speculative mood, the question might be whether or not the would-be buyer wants the Mountain Pass mine alone or the entire company including Molycorp Canada’s processing facility.












“Molycorp announced that it shares with a value of 200, and will sell bonds worth 100 million dollars to pay the capital costs.”
Indeed, as announced early this morning, Molycorp actually issued more shares and bonds than originally announced, $225 million shares and $150 million notes (bonds), plus up to 15% additional of each if overallotment is exercised.
WOW
some investors got seriously burned on this one
DYOR
I am a LYNAS fan as they have their separation plant up and running
sorry to say but the downfall of Moly is a bonus for Lynas
Too bad you haven’t followed Great Western Minerals lately, and what’s expected over the next few days. You shall feel sorry for yourself.
Have you distinguished gentlemen considered the possibility that all 3 of these companies are turkeys?
Wanna bet!
Oh, Great Western is doing some more drilling, for diamonds or whatever. I’m real impressed. Or is there even bigger news to come in the next days?
Moly has accumulated huge debts collecting acquisitions and covering on its operating losses and cost overruns. Its making a loss on its mine. Apart from Neo the acquisitions are rubbish as are their products (apart from the dymiums). Sorbex may help a bit but basically the diagnosis is gangrene.
Unless, of course, they’re able to sell their $1bn of goodwill and intangibles at a profit!
The latest cap raising deserves to fail.
Mr. Bruno,
Your article assumes the problem with Molycorp is mainly the Mountain Pass expansion. Certainly there are troubles there. But the cash bleed at Moly seems to have started and increased since Moly acquired NEO.Did the NEO mask cost problems at Mountian Pass? Perhaps. But NEO had a fair sum of debt of it’s own when it was acquired.
Smith’s leaving and the appointment of a manufacturing CEO (the former NEO CEO), Constantine Karayannopoulos, while capable, is a little odd if the problem is the mining side, notwithstanding the old NEO Pitanga Project. However, if the problem is the integration of NEO into Moly, Karayannopoulos is a good choice.
My view is Molycorp is currently failing on mulitple fronts from several questionable acquisitions. Serveral of these companies appear to have done better on their own. And in fact it is common to see vertical integration models run into this exact problem. When one portion of the business model goes weak, it often has spillover effects on the other parts. It’s a bit like bottlenecks at a miner except on a larger scale in multiple areas thus making the problem even harder to resolve.
There are 3 the most important words all over the world: MADE IN CHINA. sorry Moly, sorry Lynas but ot will be hard to compete with RE on current leveles (e.g. cerium ox 7 USD RTD). As far as I remember Lynas calculated business plan on CeO2 at 15 USD…
Ujek, your forgetting the Lynas basket at $37kg v Moly $26kg, plus I’d venture Lynas has a more solid book of LT offtake partners, with no “Sorbx” inventory. With start up costs probably more like $20kg Lynas has considerable advantage.
Plenty of debate that Chinese costs have risen considerably and recent moves to shut down production, stockpiling, trading platforms, rationalisation, etc. do not suggest China is about to flood the market. Quotas, tariffs & taxes all remain at recent levels and as China’s policy has clearly been to drawn ROW OEM’s with cheaper domestic RE there is no evidence to support your statement.
The think is many industries realise they do not need to use so much expensive(2 years ago) RE or even they do not need it at all (e.g. glass -selenium intstead erbium, automotive – will they really need Nd in 5 years?).Additionally Ce is more common then Cu.
Sb. from Neo told few years ago that it is not problem to produce Re compounds – the winner is this one who can procude RE for demanding customers (e.g. 5N). Can Lynas meet this chalange….?
Undoubtedly China misunderstanding of free market forces has resulted in considerable demand destruction, quite probably just as the China strategy of drawing ROW OEM’s reached it’s zenith.
” not problem to produce Re compounds” – I guess that’s where grade & suite + CoP come into play, having the “right stuff”. at the right price.
“procude RE for demanding customers” with Rhodia standing squarely behind Lynas with their 40 years of RE experience in design, build & operate (they taught the Chinese BTW) I think there is good reson for confidence. Eric Noyrez, Lynas COO (& CEO in waiting IMO) was previously President Rhodia Silica with responsibility for their RE business. Rhodia are world leader in Auto Cat wash (Ce/La) & substantial in lighting/med imaging (Eu, Tb +Y). Round that off with the Siemens magnet JV (Nd, Pr & Dy) and I’d say Lynas has built a pretty respectable customer/partner network.
And they didn’t have to shell out $1.2B+ like Moly to get hold of the expertise. They simply leveraged their product suite and put up the offer of a reliable supple of non Chinese CREO.
The Japanese Govt. obviously thought it was a good deal and fully financed Stage 2 plus 70% offtake. Lynas will be around for a while, and just wait till the market works out Duncan.
Tim,
I would be interested in your thoughts about what LYC are going to do with Duncan. I hold LYC.
I thought they might go for a JV to get them processed since that is where the money is.
Given that thre expertise to process and separate is rare then those that dont have their own source of heavies will have to pay high prices whereas those companies who do the GWG mine to magnet get the inputs cheap.
So does LYC commence a mine to magnet itself, do a JV with an OEM or Rhodia or just simply take the high prices for raw materials and let someone else do the processing?
regards
Steve